Weekes v. The Procter & Gamble Company
| Robert Weekes |
| The Procter & Gamble Company |
| 1:2022cv00941 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), plaintiff Robert Weekes hereby gives notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, against defendant The Procter & Gamble Company. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/6/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Procter & Gamble Company. Document filed by Robert Weekes. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kroub, Edward) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Courts calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after thirty (30) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/12/2022) (mml)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Robert Weekes..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 4/13/2022. (kv) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program to take place by June 6, 2022. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in good faith. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling Order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. To the extent possible, the Mediation Program is directed to appoint a mediator with expertise in the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 4/18/2022. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/7/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 14
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties have conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 3 days. On October 12, 2022, at 4:20p.m. a pre-motion conference will be held for any anticipated dispositive motions, provided: A party wishing to file a summary judgment or other dispositive motion shall file a pre-motion letter at least two weeks before the conference and in the form provided in the Court's Individual Rule III.A.1. Any party wishing to oppose shall file a responsive letter as provided in the same Individual Rule. The motion will be discussed at the conference. To join the conference, the parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and use Access Code558-3333. The time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed at that time. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the dates under paragraphs 5, 6, 8(a), 9(b)-(c) and 13(a)-(c) into the Court's calendar. If Defendant objects to any of the deadlines in this Order, Defendant shall file a letter motion by April 13, 2022. SO ORDERED. Amended Pleadings due by 5/12/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 5/12/2022. Deposition due by 8/11/2022. Fact Discovery due by 8/11/2022. Expert Discovery due by 9/26/2022. Telephone Conference set for 10/12/2022 at 04:20 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/7/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the April 13, 2022, initial pretrial conference is cancelled. If the parties believe that a conference would nevertheless be useful, they should inform the court immediately so the conference can be reinstated. The case management plan and scheduling order will issue in a separate order. The parties' attention is particularly directed to the provisions for periodic status letters, and the need for a pre-motion letter to avoid cancellation of the final conference and setting of a trial date. It is further ORDERED that if Defendant(s) seek to file a motion to dismiss, they shall file a pre-motion letter pursuant to Individual Rules III.A.1 and III.C.2. It is further ORDERED, regarding settlement discussions, the parties' request for a referral for mediation is GRANTED. The referral will issue in a separate order. The parties should be aware that the Court does not extend the deadlines for fact and expert discovery absent compelling circumstances. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/7/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 12 INITIAL REPORT OF PARTIES BEFORE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Document filed by The Procter & Gamble Company..(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL REPORT OF PARTIES BEFORE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Document filed by Robert Weekes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Case Management Plan).(Kroub, Edward) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint by April 15, 2022. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/11/2022) (rro)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: The Procter & Gamble Company answer due 4/15/2022. (rro) |
| Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Joseph J. Lynett dated 03/10/2022. Document filed by The Procter & Gamble Company..(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James Lynett on behalf of The Procter & Gamble Company..(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Caitlin L. O'Fallon on behalf of The Procter & Gamble Company..(O'Fallon, Caitlin) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. The Procter & Gamble Company served on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. Service was accepted by Ben Zeiger, Intake Specialist. Document filed by Robert Weekes..(Kroub, Edward) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code 558-3333. IPTC MATERIALS DUE: April 6, 2022 at noon. (And as further set forth herein.) Initial Conference set for 4/13/2022 at 04:20 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/3/2022) (jca)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Procter & Gamble Company..(pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Procter & Gamble Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Robert Weekes..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Procter & Gamble Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25677238)Document filed by Robert Weekes..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Weekes v. The Procter & Gamble Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Weekes | |
| Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company | |
| Represented By: | Joseph James Lynett |
| Represented By: | Caitlin L. O'Fallon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
