Lazri v. Studio Cahs, Ltd. et al
| Priscilla Lazri |
| Studio Cahs, Ltd., Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil and Charles Stewart |
| 1:2022cv01158 |
| February 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 5/2/2022.(ah) |
Filing 14
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 4/4/2022. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/10/2019) (jpt)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil, Charles Stewart, Studio Cahs, Ltd...(Whalen, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Whalen on behalf of Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil, Charles Stewart, Studio Cahs, Ltd...(Whalen, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Caterina Heil served on 3/16/2022, answer due 4/6/2022. Service was accepted by Jane Doe, Co-Worker. Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Cahs Construction Ltd. served on 3/16/2022, answer due 4/6/2022. Service was accepted by Jane Doe, Authorized Agent. Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Charles Stewart served on 3/2/2022, answer due 3/23/2022. Service was accepted by Jane Doe, Co-Tenant. Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Studio Cahs, Ltd. served on 3/1/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, Legal Clerk. Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by June 15, 2022, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, to Orders_and_Judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by June 15, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/15/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by June 15, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. 2. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. ( As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/15/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/15/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil, Charles Stewart, Studio Cahs, Ltd...(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Giustino Cilenti. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Priscilla Lazri. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Priscilla Lazri re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Add Priscilla Lazri to CM ECF with the party text "on behalf of others similarly situated". Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Studio Cahs, Ltd., Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil, and Charles Stewart, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cahs Construction Ltd., Caterina Heil, Charles Stewart, Studio Cahs, Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25715995)Document filed by Priscilla Lazri..(Cilenti, Giustino) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
