Doncouse v. Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc. et al
Graciela Doncouse |
Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc. and Soho Centrale, LLC |
1:2022cv01163 |
February 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
James L Cott |
Paul G Gardephe |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Graciela Doncouse ("Plaintiff") on the one hand, and Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc. and Soho Centrale, LLC (collectively, "Defendants") on the other hand, by and through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that this action be and hereby is voluntarily and finally dismissed with prejudice, without costs, expenses or attorney's fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/8/22) (yv) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 18 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Michael F. Fleming dated August 1, 2022. Document filed by Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC..(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The Application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/15/2022) (ks) |
Filing 16 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time To Reopen addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Bradly G. Marks dated July 14, 2022. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Rodriguez, Alicia) |
Filing 15 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this order, either party may apply by letter within the thirty-day period for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Any pending dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 6/15/2022) (ks) |
Filing 14 CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Stay addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Michael Fleming dated June 13, 2022. Document filed by Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC..(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 13 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Michael F. Fleming dated May 17, 2022. filed by Soho Centrale, LLC, Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc. ENDORSMENT: The Application is granted. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 5/26/2022) (ks) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Michael F. Fleming dated May 17, 2022.. All Defendants. As Judge Gardephe has referred this case to me for general pretrial supervision, I will address this application and grant it. The time for defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to June 16, on consent. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott)(Text Only Order) (Cott, James) |
Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Michael F. Fleming dated May 17, 2022. Document filed by Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC..(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Friel Fleming on behalf of Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC..(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas T. Schwarz on behalf of Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC..(Schwarz, Douglas) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The Complaint in this case was filed on February 10, 2022. (Dkt. No. 1) Defendants were served on March 10, 2022, and their Answers were due on March 31, 2022. (Dkt. Nos. 6-7) To date, no Defendant in this action has responded to the Complaint or otherwise appeared. Accordingly, by May 18, 2022, Plaintiff will move for default judgment against Defendants or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Any application for a default judgment must comply with this Court's Individual Rules of Practice for Civil Cases.( Motions due by 5/18/2022.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 5/6/2022) (rro) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc. served on 3/10/2022, answer due 3/31/2022. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Soho Centrale, LLC served on 3/10/2022, answer due 3/31/2022. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/11/2022) (ks) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bradly G. Marks. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code p (Plaintiff). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to n (None). (vf) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so redesignated. (aea) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CHLOE BOUTIQUE S.A., INC. AND SOHO CENTRALE, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chloe Boutique S.A., Inc., Soho Centrale, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25716858)Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.