Lantigua v. Pride Technologies LLC et al
| Yessenia Lantigua |
| Pride Technologies LLC and Leo Russell |
| 1:2022cv01238 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Sarah L Cave |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Alison J. Nathan is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
Filing 11
ORDER. The Request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a renewed request supported by a showing of good cause as to why this case should be stayed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 4/8/22) (yv)
|
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted Notice of Reassignment. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (laq) |
| Filing 10 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Pride Technologies LLC, Leo Russell..(Dao, Tram) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so redesignated. (aea) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/3/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Leo Russell served on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. Service was accepted by Leo Russell. Document filed by Yessenia Lantigua..(Fisher, Liane) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Pride Technologies LLC served on 2/28/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky. Document filed by Yessenia Lantigua..(Fisher, Liane) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Leo Russell..(sj) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Pride Technologies LLC..(sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Fisher, Liane) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Leo Russell, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yessenia Lantigua..(Fisher, Liane) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Pride Technologies LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Yessenia Lantigua..(Fisher, Liane) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pride Technologies LLC, Leo Russell. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25730505)Document filed by Yessenia Lantigua..(Fisher, Liane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
