Sagar v. Long Island Railroad Company
John Sagar |
Long Island Railroad Company |
1:2022cv01265 |
February 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Mary Kay Vyskocil |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER:IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, That the time for Defendant, Long Island Rail Road Company ("LIRR"), to answer, amend or supplement the Answer or to make any motion with relation to the Complaint of Plaintiffs be and the same hereby is extended through and including April 15, 2022. Granted. SO ORDERED. Long Island Railroad Company answer due 4/15/2022. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 3/3/2022) (jca) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . Document filed by Long Island Railroad Company. Return Date set for 4/15/2022 at 08:00 PM..(Yodice, Christopher) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint served. Long Island Railroad Company served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. Service was accepted by Merris Gordon. Document filed by John Sagar..(Gold, Fredric) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Long Island Railroad Company. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Long Island Railroad Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by John Sagar..(Gold, Fredric) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gold, Fredric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Railroad Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25734235)Document filed by John Sagar..(Gold, Fredric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sagar v. Long Island Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Sagar | |
Represented By: | Fredric M. Gold |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Long Island Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | Christopher P. Yodice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.