Miller v. Malin + Goetz Inc. et al
| Kimberly Miller |
| Malin + Goetz Inc. and Malin + Goetz Skincare Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01278 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The parties may reopen the case, provided the application to restore the action to the Court's calendar is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 4/4/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement With Prejudice. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Malin + Goetz Inc. served on 3/1/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, NYS SOS, Agent. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Malin + Goetz Skincare Inc.. (sj) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Malin + Goetz Inc.. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael A. LaBollita. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Kimberly Miller..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Malin + Goetz Skincare Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Malin + Goetz Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Malin + Goetz Inc., Malin + Goetz Skincare Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25737184)Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
