Paguada v. Art.com, Inc.
| Josue Paguada |
| Art.com, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01292 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Gabriel W Gorenstein |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Art.com, Inc. served on 3/4/2022, answer due 3/25/2022. Service was accepted by Patrick Duffy, Intake Clerk. Document filed by Josue Paguada..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. The parties are hereby notified that this Court has written on a legal issue that appears central to this case: the applicability of the ADA to websites. See Del-Orden v. Bonobos, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 2744 (PAE), 2017 WL 6547902 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/16/2022) (js)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Art.com, Inc...(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Art.com, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Josue Paguada..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Art.com, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25737716)Document filed by Josue Paguada..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Paguada v. Art.com, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Josue Paguada | |
| Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Art.com, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
