Miller v. The M Jewelers Inc.
Plaintiff: Kimberly Miller
Defendant: The M Jewelers Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01372
Filed: February 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2022 Filing 11 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay all case deadlines in this action for 45 days addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Karla Del Pozo Garcia dated April 15, 2022. Document filed by The M Jewelers Inc...(Del Pozo Garcia, Karla)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Karla Del Pozo Garcia dated March 22, 2022. Application granted. SO ORDERED. The M Jewelers Inc. answer due 4/21/2022. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/23/2022) (jca)
March 22, 2022 Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Karla Del Pozo Garcia dated March 22, 2022. Document filed by The M Jewelers Inc...(Del Pozo Garcia, Karla)
March 22, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Karla Del Pozo Garcia on behalf of The M Jewelers Inc...(Del Pozo Garcia, Karla)
March 5, 2022 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. The M Jewelers Inc. served on 3/1/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, NYS SOS, Agent. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: It is hereby: ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district's court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter requesting that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) schedule an initial status conference in the matter. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/23/2022) (ate)
February 18, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The M Jewelers Inc.. (sj)
February 18, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
February 18, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
February 18, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael A. LaBollita. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj)
February 18, 2022 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
February 17, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Kimberly Miller..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey)
February 17, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael)
February 17, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The M Jewelers Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael)
February 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The M Jewelers Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25750367)Document filed by Kimberly Miller..(LaBollita, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. The M Jewelers Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Miller
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb
Represented By: Michael A. LaBollita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The M Jewelers Inc.
Represented By: Karla Del Pozo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?