Tucker v. United States of America
| Scott Tucker |
| United States of America |
| 1:2022cv01470 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P Kevin Castel |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by Scott Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex A: Affidavit of Scott Tucker, #2 Exhibit Ex B: Paul Shechtman Biography, #3 Exhibit Ex C: Paula Junghan Biograph, #4 Affidavit Ex D: Nadjia Limani Affidavit, #5 Exhibit Ex E: Tucker's Appeal Brief to Second Circuit).(gp) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:16-cr-91-1 (PKC).Document filed by Scott Tucker..(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
