Armstead v. Trump
| Brenda C. Armstead |
| Former President Donald J. Trump |
| 1:2022cv01498 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Brenda C. Armstead at P.O. Box 181441, Casselberry, FL 32718. (kh) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the November 8, 2017 order in Armstead v. Crist, ECF 1:17-CV-7537, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2017), this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/9/22) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On November 8, 2017, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis ("IFP") without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Armstead v. Crist, ECF 1:17-CV-7537, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2017). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, has not paid the fees to bring this action, and has not sought leave to file from the court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's November 8, 2017 order in Armstead, ECF 1:17-CV-7537, 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/9/22) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Filing 2 ADDENDUM TO CAUSE. Document filed by Brenda C. Armstead..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donald J. Trump. Document filed by Brenda C. Armstead..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armstead v. Trump | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brenda C. Armstead | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Former President Donald J. Trump | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
