Ortega v. The Stroop Club LLC
Juan Ortega |
The Stroop Club LLC |
1:2022cv01525 |
February 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of the Court's February 28, 2022 Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference, Docket No. 6 served on The Stroop Club LLC on April 20, 2022. Service was made by Electronic Mail. Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint shall be extended to May 9, 2022. To accommodate this extension, the initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for May 4, 2022, is hereby ADJOURNED to May 26, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. This conference will proceed telephonically. At the appointed time, the parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Please note the conference will not be available prior to 10:00 a.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 10. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/5/2022) (rro) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: The Stroop Club LLC answer due 5/9/2022., Set/Reset Hearings:( Initial Conference set for 5/26/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) (rro) |
Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from John M. Osmanski dated April 4, 2022. Document filed by The Stroop Club LLC..(Osmanski, John) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #8 Motion for John M. Osmanski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 8. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/4/2022) (rro) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #8 MOTION for John M. Osmanski to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25952682. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (vba) |
Filing 8 MOTION for John M. Osmanski to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25952682. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Stroop Club LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Osmanski, John) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. The Stroop Club LLC served on 3/18/2022, answer due 4/8/2022. Service was accepted by Marco Basaldua, Store Associate. Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on May 4, 2022, at 2:30 p.m. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Initial Conference set for 5/4/2022 at 02:30 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/28/2022) (rro) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Stroop Club LLC..(gp) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Stroop Club LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Stroop Club LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25773144)Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ortega v. The Stroop Club LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Juan Ortega | |
Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Stroop Club LLC | |
Represented By: | John Osmanski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.