Malik v. Garland et al
| Syeda Sana Malik |
| Merrick B. Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, District Director Thomas M. Cioppa, Alejandro Mayorkas and Thomas M. Cioppa |
| 1:2022cv01686 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Thomas M. Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas M. Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas..(lal) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas M. Cioppa, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Syeda Sana Malik..(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas M. Cioppa. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25793446).Document filed by Syeda Sana Malik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B).(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 3/1/2022 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
