Hochfelder v. Pacific Indemnity Company
Lynda Arnet Hochfelder |
Pacific Indemnity Company |
1:2022cv02012 |
March 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Mary Kay Vyskocil |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(Ferland, Paul) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Lynda Arnet Hochfelder..(Catafago, Jacques) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(Ferland, Paul) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(Ferland, Paul) |
NOTICE OF REDESIGNATION TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The above entitled action has been redesignated to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. Please note that this is a reassignment of the designation only..(rdz) |
Filing 9 ORDER terminating #7 Letter Motion for Conference re: #7 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Paul Ferland dated April 19, 2022. The Court has reviewed the letters filed at ECF Nos. 7 and 8 and has determined that a pre-motion conference is not necessary. Defendant is granted leave to file its contemplated motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion shall be due on or before June 1, 2022. Plaintiff's opposition, if any, shall be due on or before July 1, 2022. Defendant's reply shall be due fourteen days after Plaintiff's opposition. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 5/2/2022) (vfr) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 6/1/2022. Responses due by 7/1/2022 (vfr) |
NOTICE OF REDESIGNATION TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The above entitled action has been redesignated to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. Please note that this is a reassignment of the designation only. (sac) |
Filing 8 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Jacques Catafago dated April 22, 2022 re: #7 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Paul Ferland dated April 19, 2022. . Document filed by Lynda Arnet Hochfelder..(Catafago, Jacques) |
Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Paul Ferland dated April 19, 2022. Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(Ferland, Paul) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Pacific Indemnity Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25932160)Document filed by Lynda Arnet Hochfelder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy).(Catafago, Jacques) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Vincent Passarelli on behalf of Pacific Indemnity Company..(Passarelli, Vincent) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacques Catafago on behalf of Lynda Arnet Hochfelder..(Catafago, Jacques) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Corporate Parent Chubb Group Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Chubb INA Holdings, Inc. for Pacific Indemnity Company. Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company..(Ferland, Paul) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Ferland, Paul) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 650534/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25844461).Document filed by Pacific Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons with Notice, #2 Exhibit B Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit C Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal).(Ferland, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hochfelder v. Pacific Indemnity Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lynda Arnet Hochfelder | |
Represented By: | Jacques Catafago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pacific Indemnity Company | |
Represented By: | Paul Christopher Ferland |
Represented By: | Vincent Passarelli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.