Sabet v. Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedures et al
| Samuel A. Sabet |
| Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedures and Scott Myers, Esq. |
| 1:2022cv02441 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LETTER from S. Sabet, re: Therefore, as a matter of law, the petitioner is entitled to summary judgment stringently in connection with new pro se filing case #1:22-cv-02441-LTS. There is no unconstitutional waiver that makes it so the controls over discretion are awarded to the Courts for Constitutional Safeguards relating to the rights of the person can be assailed or denied, and this is a definitive and bedrock rule. Coppedge v. United States: 369 U.S. (1962). Document filed by Samuel A. Sabet.(sc) |
Filing 6
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the January 31, 2008 order in S.A. Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., No. 07-CV-11042 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/28/22) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On January 31, 2008, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new actions in this District without first obtaining leave to file. See S.A. Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., No. 07-CV-11042 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. 08-1068-cv (2d Cir. May 29, 2008). Plaintiff filed this new pro se action, seeks in forma pauperis status (IFP), and has not sought leave to file from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the January 31, 2008, judgment. All pending motions are terminated. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff consents to electronic service. (ECF 3.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/28/22) (rdz)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Filing 4 MOTION re: for Permission for Samuel A. Sabet to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Samuel A. Sabet. (sac) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Samuel A. Sabet consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Samuel A. Sabet. (sac) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedures, Scott Myers, Esq. Document filed by Samuel A. Sabet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Samuel A. Sabet. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
