Brown v. John Civetta & Sons. et al
Plaintiff: Mary Brown
Defendant: John Civetta & Sons. and Joshua Madray
Case Number: 1:2022cv02609
Filed: March 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER: It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Fisher Taubenfeld, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiff, and McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys for Defendants, John Civeta & Sons and Joshua Madray's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to June 13, 2022. Consent is hereby given to the filing of this Stipulation with the Clerk of the Court. Defendants waive all defenses as to service of process. SO ORDERED. John Civetta & Sons. answer due 6/13/2022; Joshua Madray answer due 6/13/2022. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 5/17/2022) (kv)
May 17, 2022 Filing 11 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by John Civetta & Sons., Joshua Madray..(Shah, Vimal)
May 17, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Vimal K. Shah on behalf of John Civetta & Sons., Joshua Madray..(Shah, Vimal)
April 25, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Joshua Madray served on 4/21/2022, answer due 5/12/2022. Service was accepted by Ms. Stephanie. Document filed by Mary Brown..(Fisher, Liane)
April 13, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. John Civetta & Sons. served on 4/4/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty. Document filed by Mary Brown..(Fisher, Liane)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on June 24, 2022 at 11:45 a.m. The Court will hold this conference by telephone. The parties shall use the dial-in information provided below to call into the conference: Call-in Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This conference line is open to the public. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/13/2022) Initial Conference set for 6/24/2022 at 11:45 AM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (ks)
March 31, 2022 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Joshua Madray. (vf)
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to John Civetta & Sons. (vf)
March 31, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
March 31, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
March 31, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Liane Fisher. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Nature of Suit code 440 (Civil Rights: Other); County code Kings. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 442 (Civil Rights: Jobs); the County code has been modified to New York. (vf)
March 31, 2022 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
March 30, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Joshua Madray, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Mary Brown..(Fisher, Liane)
March 30, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to John Civetta & Sons., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Mary Brown..(Fisher, Liane)
March 30, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Fisher, Liane)
March 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Civetta & Sons., Joshua Madray. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25937908)Document filed by Mary Brown..(Fisher, Liane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. John Civetta & Sons. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Brown
Represented By: Liane Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Civetta & Sons.
Represented By: Vimal K. Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Madray
Represented By: Vimal K. Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?