John Doe v. City Of New York et al
| John Doe |
| City Of New York, NYPD Sergeant Richard Roe and NYPD Officers John and Jane Roes #1-10 |
| 1:2022cv02690 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P Kevin Castel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond, upon consent addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Alan H. Scheiner dated May 3, 2022. LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference Upon Consent addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Alan H. Scheiner dated May 3, 2022.. City Of New York answer due 7/5/2022( Initial Conference set for 7/25/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.); granting #8 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. Time to respond extended to July 5, 2022. Initial pretrial conference adjourned to July 25, 2022 at 11:30 AM, to be held telephonically (Dial-in: 1-888-363-4749; Access code: 3667981). SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 5/4/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond, upon consent addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Alan H. Scheiner dated May 3, 2022., LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference Upon Consent addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Alan H. Scheiner dated May 3, 2022. Document filed by City Of New York..(Scheiner, Alan)
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. City Of New York served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022. Service was accepted by Lamar Reid, Clerk. Document filed by John Doe..(Celli, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF (OR THE REMOVING DEFENDANT) SHALL IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO ALL PARTIES. Counsel for all parties shall appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference, held pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on May 16, 2022 at 11:30 a.m. Principal trial counsel shall appear at this and all subsequent conferences. The call-in information for all teleconferences is:Dial-in: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 3667981. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 5/16/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge P. Kevin Castel. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 4/14/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew G. Celli on behalf of John Doe..(Celli, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 4
SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (nmo)
|
|
Filing 3
DOCUMENTS TO BE SEALED (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/30/2022) (pc) (pc).
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(pc) (gp).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City Of New York, John and Jane Roes #1-10, Richard Roe. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465410296318)Document filed by John Doe..(pc) (gp).
|
|
ORDER REDACTING PLEADING FILED IN 21-MC-96. Document filed by John Doe..(pc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
