Mason et al v. 3M Company et al
| Debra Mason, Janet Fowler, Jackie Pernell and Robert Gates |
| 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc., Archroma U.S., Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemdesign Products Inc., Chemguard Inc, Chemicals, Inc., Clariant Corporation, Corteva, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc., Dynax Corporation, E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Nation Ford Chemical Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC LLC, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Doe Defendants 1-20, 3M Company and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. |
| 1:2022cv02694 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Sarah L Cave |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - South District of South Carolina acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:22-cv-01285, filed on 04/21/2022. (laq) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/20/22) (laq) |
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina.(laq) |
Filing 8
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto and their undersigned counsel that if this action is transferred to the In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability multi-district litigation ("AFFF MDL"), then the deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Summons and Complaint shall be in accordance with the established rules and procedures in the AFFF MDL. Should the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decline to transfer this action to the AFFF MDL, Defendants shall have through and including the 28th day after such disposition by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Defendant 3M's requested extension (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED as set forth above. The Clerk of Court isrespectfully directed to close ECF No. 7. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: #7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave from Jordan D. Sagalowsky dated April 14, 2022. filed by 3M Company. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 4/15/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave from Jordan D. Sagalowsky dated April 14, 2022. Document filed by 3M Company..(Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court declines to endorse the parties' proposed stipulation and order. See Dkt. No. 5. On April 4, 2022, the Court referred this case to designated Magistrate Judge. Dkt. No. 4. Thus, any proposed stipulation should be addressed to the designated Magistrate Judge. Further, even if the request were properly before the Court, the parties have not followed the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, which require that any proposed stipulation be accompanied by a letter to the Court stating, among other things, the reason for the parties' request that Court endorse the stipulation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/13/2022) (rro)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by 3M Company..(Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). All such motions. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/4/22) (yv)
|
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co)..(Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 151570/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25949196).Document filed by 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint).(Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
