Todie v. Bronx III Parole Division Entire Staff et al
| Eugene Andrew Todie |
| Bronx III Parole Division Entire Staff and Bronx Regional Manager Knight |
| 1:2022cv02758 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Eugene Todie, dated 4/17/22 re: Pleased be advised that I have been wrongfully incarcerated by the Parole Division in retaliation for filing a brief in your Court against them. My permanent mailing address is 65-44 Saunders Street, Rego Park, New York 11374. Please cc the mailing officer at Rikers Island if you choose to mail me correspondence. address will be. Document filed by, Eugene Andrew Todie.(sc) Modified on 5/4/2022 (sc). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of INTENT TO FILE A CLAIM. Document filed by Eugene Andrew Todie..(rdz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis. Document filed by Eugene Andrew Todie..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Bronx III Parole Division Entire Staff, Bronx Regional Manager Knight. Document filed by Eugene Andrew Todie..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Eugene Andrew Todie..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
