Gwinn v. Laird Superfood, Inc.
Lovelynn Gwinn |
Laird Superfood, Inc. |
1:2022cv02883 |
April 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vernon S Broderick |
Denise L Cote |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 1/5/2023 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 18B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Denise L. Cote. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/1/2022) (vfr) |
Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. filed by Laird Superfood, Inc. The defendant's June 8, 2022 motion to dismiss is granted with respect to the plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment, but otherwise denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 12/1/2022) (vfr) |
Filing 27 ORDER: On September 19, 2022, counsel for the defendant submitted a letter pursuant to Rule 4.G. of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, noting that a motion has been fully submitted for sixty days. The parties are hereby advised that the Court is aware of the fully submitted motion, and will decide it as expeditiously as possible. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 9/22/2022) (vfr) |
Filing 26 LETTER addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Jacob M. Harper dated September 19, 2022 re: Letter Pursuant to Judge Cote's Individual Practices in Civil Cases Section 4.G Regarding Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Harper, Jacob) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Denise L. Cote. Judge Vernon S. Broderick is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
Filing 25 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #24 Motion for Jacob M. Harper to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/27/2022) (kv) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #24 MOTION for Jacob M. Harper to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26466805. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Jacob M. Harper to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26466805. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit #3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice).(Harper, Jacob) Modified on 7/27/2022 (sgz). |
Filing 23 RESPONSE in Support of Motion re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. . Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Canner, Heather) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. . Document filed by Lovelynn Gwinn..(Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #20 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Responses due by 7/6/2022. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/21/2022) (kv) |
Filing 20 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. until and including to July 6, 2022 addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Robert Abiri dated June 20, 2022. Document filed by Lovelynn Gwinn..(Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 19 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: granting #18 Motion for Heather Canner to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/10/2022) (ama) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #18 MOTION for Heather Canner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number BNYSDC-26263740. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Heather Canner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number BNYSDC-26263740. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In support of Motion to admit counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice).(Canner, Heather) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying #16 Letter Motion for Oral Argument. Defendant's request for oral argument is DENIED at this time. I will schedule oral argument if I decide it would be helpful. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/9/2022) (tg) |
***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. #15 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (km) |
Filing 16 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument Re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Mohammad 3. Pathan dated June 8, 2022. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 15 PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc.. Related Document Number: #11 ..(Pathan, Mohammad) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
Filing 14 NOTICE of (Request for Judicial Notice) re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim.. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Jacob M. Harper in Support re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim.. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (8 ounce Laird Superfood Original Creamer Label), #2 Exhibit B (10 ounce Laird Superfood Unsweetened Creamer Label), #3 Exhibit C (Laird Superfood Performance Mushroom Label)).(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. . Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Complaint in this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint until and including June 8, 2022, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Mohammad B. Pathan dated May 31, 2022., #1 Complaint. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Laird Superfood, Inc. answer due 6/8/2022. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/1/2022) (kv) |
Filing 9 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint until and including June 8, 2022, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Mohammad B. Pathan dated May 31, 2022. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint until and including June 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Mohammad B. Pathan dated April 29, 2022., #1 Complaint. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Laird Superfood, Inc. answer due 6/1/2022. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 5/2/2022) (tg) |
Filing 7 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint until and including June 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Mohammad B. Pathan dated April 29, 2022. Document filed by Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mohammad Basim Pathan on behalf of Laird Superfood, Inc...(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Laird Superfood, Inc. served on 4/11/2022, answer due 5/2/2022. Service was accepted by Amy McLaren, Managing Agent. Document filed by Lovelynn Gwinn..(Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Laird Superfood, Inc...(pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Laird Superfood, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lovelynn Gwinn..(Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Laird Superfood, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25976691)Document filed by Lovelynn Gwinn..(Abiri, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gwinn v. Laird Superfood, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lovelynn Gwinn | |
Represented By: | Robert Abiri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Laird Superfood, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mohammad Basim Pathan |
Represented By: | Heather F. Canner |
Represented By: | Jacob Harper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.