Oakes v. United States Department of Defense
Cameron Oakes |
United States Department of Defense |
1:2022cv02973 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Lewis J Liman |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference Initial Pretrial Conference addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Raymond M. Baldino dated June 1, 2022. Document filed by Cameron Oakes..(Baldino, Raymond) |
![]() |
Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time from Natasha W. Teleanu dated 5/25/2022. Document filed by United States Department of Defense..(Teleanu, Natasha) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Natasha Waglow Teleanu on behalf of United States Department of Defense..(Teleanu, Natasha) |
![]() |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States Department of Defense..(lal) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to United States Department of Defense, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Cameron Oakes..(Baldino, Raymond) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Baldino, Raymond) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Raymond Baldino. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Defense. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25991501)Document filed by Cameron Oakes..(Baldino, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oakes v. United States Department of Defense | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cameron Oakes | |
Represented By: | Raymond Baldino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Department of Defense | |
Represented By: | Natasha Waglow Teleanu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.