Mubarez v. Old Republic Insurance Company et al
Ahmed Humadi Mubarez |
Old Republic Insurance Company |
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and All State Insurance Company |
1:2022cv02984 |
April 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 9 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Anne E. Armstrong dated June 3, 2022 re: Initial Case Management Plan. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order).(Hemway, Michael) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint., CROSSCLAIM against All State Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company..(Hemway, Michael) |
|
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Old Republic Insurance Company for Old Republic Insurance Company. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company..(Hemway, Michael) |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company..(Hemway, Michael) Modified on 4/12/2022 (lb). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Michael Joseph Hemway to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael Joseph Hemway. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Origin code 1 (Original Proceeding); County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Origin code has been modified to 2 (Removal from State Court); the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Michael Joseph Hemway to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Notice of Removal to Adverse Parties re: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Supreme Court Summons & Complaint).(Hemway, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hemway, Michael) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company..(Hemway, Michael) Modified on 4/12/2022 (lb). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme, County of New York. Case Number: 151893/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25992551).Document filed by Old Republic Insurance Company..(Hemway, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.