Miles v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital et al
| Dylan Miles |
| New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Dr. Asad R. Siddiqi, DO Mike Mizrahi, Magali Lopez and Dr. Daniel Jung Pak |
| 1:2022cv03161 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Dylan Miles 5541 W. 181st Street PMB #275 New York, NY 10033. (kh) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The Court declines, under 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of Plaintiff's state law claims. The Court directs the Clerk of Court not to enter judgment and to hold this matter open on the docket for 30 days to allow Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, it must be submitted to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within 30 days of the date of this order, be captioned as an "Amended Complaint," and be labeled with the docket number 22-CV-3161 (LTS). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/16/2022) (sac)
|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Dylan Miles 5541 W. 181st Street PMB #275 New York, NY 10033. (kh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/2/2022) (vn)
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Dylan Miles. (Attachments: #1 main document)(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff must also notify the Court within 30 days of Plaintiff's mailing address for service of documents. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 5/18/2022. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 5/18/2022. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/18/2022) (Attachments: #1 IFP application, #2 Change of Address, #3 Consent to e-service, #4 Consent to e-service Instructions) (keb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Magali Lopez, Mike Mizrahi, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Daniel Jung Pak, Asad R. Siddiqi. Document filed by Dylan Miles..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
