Lavi v. MUFG Bank et al
Pierre Lavi |
MUFG Bank and Danamon Bank |
1:2022cv03167 |
April 18, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 8. Mailed to: Pierre Lavi 10 Auserehl Ct. Huntington, NY 11743. (kh) |
![]() |
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (tro) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE - TRANSFER CASE: This case is assigned to: Unassigned Judge. (laq) |
Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of New York Eastern; Case Number: 1:22-cv-01603. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq) |
Case Designated ECF. (laq) |
![]() |
Case electronically transferred to the Southern District of New York. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Gonzalez, Fida) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/18/2022.] |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; filed by Pierre Lavi, dated 4/1/2022. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/18/2022.] |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/18/2022.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (Document mailed) (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/18/2022.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Pierre Lavi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supporting Documents) (Bowens, Priscilla) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 4/18/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.