Sundaram v. Belk, Inc. et al
| Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram |
| Belk, Inc., Belk Ecommerce LLC and Sycamore Partners LLC |
| 1:2022cv03258 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Belk Ecommerce LLC waiver sent on 5/3/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Belk, Inc. waiver sent on 5/3/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. Document filed by Durgamritha T. Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Adam Davis on behalf of Durgamritha T. Sundaram..(Davis, Joshua) |
Filing 17
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 5/4/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 16
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by July 5, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. ( As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 5/4/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by July 5, 2022, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, to Orders_and_Judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by July 5, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 5/4/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 14 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(sj) |
| Filing 13 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PATENT FORM. Notice to Attorney Lindsay Hersh Autz to RE-FILE Document No. #10 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form is not correct; Date Filed field is incorrect. Re-file the document using the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct AO 120 Patent/Trademark PDF form. (sj) |
| Filing 11 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 4/25/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT AO 120 FORM PATENT - PDF ERROR AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 4/25/2022 (sj). |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sycamore Partners LLC..(pc) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Belk Ecommerce LLC..(pc) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Belk, Inc...(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Lindsay Hersh Autz to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Civil cover sheet was not signed;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Lindsay Hersh Autz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Durgamritha Sundaram. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PATENT FORM. Notice to Attorney Lindsay Hersh Autz to RE-FILE Document No. #6 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form is not correct; Do not use the sample form.. Re-file the document using the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct AO 120 Patent/Trademark PDF form. (pc) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 4/22/2022 (pc). |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sycamore Partners LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Belk Ecommerce, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Belk, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Autz, Lindsay) Modified on 4/22/2022 (pc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Belk Ecommerce LLC, Belk, Inc., Sycamore Partners LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26038930)Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Autz, Lindsay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
