Lin v. Cardinale
| Shi Jin Lin |
| Acting District Dir Joseph Cardinale and Joseph Cardinale |
| 1:2022cv03316 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time; granting #5 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. Defendant's time to answer is hereby ADJOURNED until August 23, 2022. The Initial Pre-Trial Conference currently scheduled for June 24, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. is hereby ADJOURNED until September 23, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Pre-conference submissions are due not later than September 15, 2022. SO ORDERED. ( Initial Conference set for 9/23/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Valerie E. Caproni.). (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 6/14/2022) (tg)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time of government's response deadline of sixty-days from June 24, 2022 to August 23, 2022 addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from SAUSA Jacqueline Roman dated June 14, 2022., LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference presently scheduled for June 24, 2022 to a day during the week of September 6, 2022 (with a corresponding extension for the preconference submissions, See ECF No. 3) addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from SAUSA Jacqueline Roman dated June 14, 2022. Document filed by Joseph Cardinale..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joseph Cardinale answer due 8/23/2022. (tg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Joseph Cardinale..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call 888-363-4749, Access code 3121171#, Security code 3316. Initial Conference set for 6/24/2022 at 03:00 PM before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 4/26/2022) (tg) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Alexa Taiz Torres. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Joseph Cardinale. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Torres, Alexa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Joseph Cardinale (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26047764).Document filed by Shi Jin Lin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tabs A-F).(Torres, Alexa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
