Lee v. Proland Management
| Kum Nam Lee |
| Proland Management |
| 1:2022cv03734 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received returned mail re: #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint). Mail was addressed to Young Yil Jo, at 1932 E. Washington Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91104 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return to Sender. (aan) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2-3. Mailed to: Kum Nam Lee 5155 Marathon St. #106 Los Angeles, CA 90038. (kh) |
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order of Dismissal, #3 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Young Yil Jo, 1932 E. Washington Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91104. (kh) |
Filing 3
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice to any civil action that Kum Nam Lee may wish to bring in the future. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Kum Nam Lee at the address listed on the court's docket, and to Young Yil Jo, at 1932 E. Washington Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91104, his address of record in In re Young Yil Jo, 1:14-CV-7793 (S.D.N.Y.), and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/12/2022) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses this action without prejudice to any civil action that Kum Nam Lee may wish to bring in the future. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Young Yil Jo, at 1932 E. Washington Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91104, his address of record for In re Young Yil Jo, 1:14-CV-7793, and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order to the address of Kum Nam Lee listed on the docket of this action. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/12/2022) (sac)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Proland Management. Document filed by Kum Nam Lee. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lee v. Proland Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kum Nam Lee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Proland Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
