Lin v. Cardinale
Plaintiff: Ren Biao Lin
Defendant: Acting District Dir Joseph Cardinale and Joseph Cardinale
Case Number: 1:2022cv03784
Filed: May 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S Broderick
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time of government's time to respond by sixty days (i.e. from July 13, 2022 to September 12, 2022) addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from SAUSA Jacqueline Roman dated July 7, 2022. Document filed by Joseph Cardinale..(Roman, Jacqueline)
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Joseph Cardinale..(Roman, Jacqueline)
May 11, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
May 11, 2022 Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
May 11, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
May 11, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Alexa Taiz Torres. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Acting District Dir Joseph Cardinale. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc)
May 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Torres, Alexa)
May 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Joseph Cardinale (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26124951).Document filed by Ren Biao Lin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tabs A-F).(Torres, Alexa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lin v. Cardinale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ren Biao Lin
Represented By: Alexa Taiz Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting District Dir Joseph Cardinale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Cardinale
Represented By: Jacqueline Roman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?