Jones v. Pliler
| Tarone M. Jones |
| Warden W.S. Pliler |
| 1:2022cv03817 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received e-mail from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 22-2446, filed on 07/07/2022..(nd) |
| Non-Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Non-Appeal Electronic Files for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tarone M. Jones, #4 Transfer Order U.S.C.A.,,, #2 Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Tarone M. Jones, #3 APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006(A)(g) (Habeas Corpus Petition). filed by Tarone M. Jones were transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit..(nd) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Tarone M. Jones IDNo.03657-029 P.O. Box 1000 Otisville, NY 10963. (kh) |
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: In the interest of justice, the Court transfers this second or successive Section 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. 28 U.S.C. 1631. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions. This order closes this action. Because the motion makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/28/22) (rdz) Transmission to Appeals Clerk.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Filing 3 (MOTION) APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006(A)(g) (Habeas Corpus Petition). Document filed by Tarone M. Jones. (sac) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Document filed by Tarone M. Jones. (sac) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Tarone M. Jones. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Pliler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tarone M. Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden W.S. Pliler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
