Lin v. Cioppa
Plaintiff: Ying Qin Lin
Defendant: Thomas A. Cioppa
Case Number: 1:2022cv03883
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Thomas A. Cioppa..(Roman, Jacqueline)
May 13, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas A. Cioppa. (vf)
May 13, 2022 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
May 13, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
May 13, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
May 13, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Nataliya I Gavlin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 05:552(a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus; County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus; the County code has been modified to Kings. (vf)
May 13, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Nataliya I Gavlin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ying Qin Lin, Thomas A. Cioppa. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (vf)
May 12, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gavlin, Nataliya)
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Thomas A. Cioppa, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Ying Qin Lin..(Gavlin, Nataliya)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Thomas A. Cioppa (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26139458).Document filed by Ying Qin Lin..(Gavlin, Nataliya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lin v. Cioppa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ying Qin Lin
Represented By: Nataliya I Gavlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas A. Cioppa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?