Ramos v. Department of Homeless Services et al
Jose Antonio Ramos |
Department of Homeless Services, Breaking Ground and City Of New York |
1:2022cv03959 |
May 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vernon S Broderick |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Jose Antonio Ramos 505 8th Ave. 2nd Floor New York, NY 10018. (kh) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/16/2022) (vn) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Breaking Ground, Department of Homeless Services. Document filed by Jose Antonio Ramos..(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jose Antonio Ramos..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.