Araujo v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Edwin Araujo
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2022cv04056
Filed: May 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Valerie E Caproni
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Edwin Araujo Reg.69460-054 P.O. Box 329002 Brooklyn, NY 11232. (dsh)
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE WAIVER (INFORMED CONSENT): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel shall give sworn testimony, in the form of an affidavit, addressing the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel made by the Defendant; and it is further ORDERED that Edwin Araujo execute and return to this Court within 60 days from today's date the accompanying "Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver (Informed Consent)" form. If the document is not received by the Court within 60 days from today's date, the Court will deny the 2255 motion, on the ground that the movant failed to authorize the disclosure of information needed to permit the Government to respond to the motion; and it is further ORDERED that the Government shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the motion within sixty days of the date that the affidavits of Counsel are made available to the Government. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this notice and the attachment to Mr. Araujo and note the mailing on the docket. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 6/21/2022) (va) Modified on 6/28/2022 (va).
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Edwin Araujo, Reg. 69460-054, at M.D.C. Brooklyn, P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232, on 5/20/2022 Re: #3 Order to Answer. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (sha)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2255: The Court, having concluded that the motion brought under 28 U.S.C. 2255 should not be summarily dismissed as being without merit, hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this order has been issued. Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the motion. Movant shall have thirty days from the date on which Movant is served with Respondent's answer to file a response. Absent further order, the motion will be considered fully submitted as of that date. All further papers filed or submitted for filing must include the criminal docket number and will be docketed in the criminal case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 5/20/2022) (ama) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:17-cr-00438-VEC-10. Document filed by Edwin Araujo. (sac)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sac)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Araujo v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin Araujo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?