Fredricks v. Whittingham
Plaintiff: Nigel Fredricks
Defendant: Phillip Whittingham
Case Number: 1:2022cv04248
Filed: May 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2022 Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Processed: Mailed copy of Docket Sheet to Nigel Fredricks, DIN: 22B1005 at Auburn Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 618, Auburn, NY 13024 on 6/17/2022. (sha)
June 16, 2022 Filing 6 LETTER from N. Fredricks, dated 6/10/22 re: I am writing to inform you that I have submitted the Prisoner Authorization form in order to further proceed. I placed my mail in the hands of an officer of the law during a prison lockdown within Auburn Correctional Facility last week etc. Please notify me that it reached the docket. Document filed by Nigel Fredricks.(sc)
June 16, 2022 Request for Copy of the updated Docket Sheet Received: Re #6 Letter. Request for Docket Report, from Nigel Fredricks received on 6/16/22. Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc)
June 13, 2022 Filing 5 LETTER from N. Fredricks, dated 6/7/22 re: I am writing on behalf of the above case in regard to the Prison Authorization to be completed in order to proceed. I submitted it with my name and handed it to the officer of the law last week during a lockdown in this facility etc. Document filed by Nigel Fredricks.(sc)
June 3, 2022 Filing 4 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Nigel Fredricks. (sac)
May 25, 2022 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Nigel Fredricks DIN:22B1005 P.O. Box 618 Auburn, NY 13024. Mailed:(Attachments: # 1 Prisoner Authorization) (dsh)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to submit a completed and signed Prisoner Authorization Form to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Prisoner Authorization Form due by 6/23/2022. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/24/2022) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization) (dmg)
May 24, 2022 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
May 23, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Phillip Whittingham. Document filed by Nigel Fredricks. (sac)
May 23, 2022 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Nigel Fredricks. (sac)
May 23, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fredricks v. Whittingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nigel Fredricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip Whittingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?