Cordero v. Electronic Arts Inc.
| Rafael Cordero |
| Electronic Arts Inc. |
| 1:2022cv04282 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #9 Notice of Settlement filed by Rafael Cordero. ENDORSEMENT: It is hereby ordered that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is madewithin thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and "so ordered" by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/22/2022) (ama)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Rafael Cordero..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Electronic Arts Inc. served on 6/10/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. Service was accepted by Nadia Bellamy, Intake Clerk. Document filed by Rafael Cordero..(Kroub, Edward) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, up to and including August 1, 2022 addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from John W. Egan dated June 23, 2022. Application granted. SO ORDERED. #1 Complaint. Electronic Arts Inc. answer due 8/1/2022. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/24/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, up to and including August 1, 2022 addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from John W. Egan dated June 23, 2022. Document filed by Electronic Arts Inc...(Egan, John) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: It is hereby: ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district's court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter requesting that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) schedule an initial status conference in the matter. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/1/2022) (ate)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Electronic Arts Inc...(gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Electronic Arts Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rafael Cordero..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Electronic Arts Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26195436)Document filed by Rafael Cordero..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cordero v. Electronic Arts Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rafael Cordero | |
| Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Electronic Arts Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John William Egan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
