Oliveras v. Long Island Railroad Company
| Ramon Oliveras |
| Long Island Railroad Company |
| 1:2022cv04600 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Sean Constable dated August 1, 2022 re: Joint Letter and Proposed Case Management Plan. Document filed by Ramon Oliveras. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order).(Constable, Sean) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Long Island Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Rule 7.1(a) Disclosure).(Blumenschein, William) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Initial Conference by telephone set for 8/10/2022 at 4:30 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. The parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code 558-3333. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 6/24/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Long Island Railroad Company..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Wietzke, Marc) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Long Island Railroad Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ramon Oliveras..(Wietzke, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Railroad Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26232927)Document filed by Ramon Oliveras..(Wietzke, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oliveras v. Long Island Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ramon Oliveras | |
| Represented By: | Marc Twyman Wietzke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Long Island Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | William J. Blumenschein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
