Loadholt v. ooShirts Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Loadholt
Defendant: ooShirts Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv04688
Filed: June 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Analisa Torres)(Text Only Order) (CP)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: granting #12 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #12 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Motion for extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Ryan T. Benson dated July 25, 2022.Granted. SO ORDERED. ooShirts Inc. answer due 8/15/2022. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/26/2022) (ama)
July 26, 2022 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #11 MOTION for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26457682. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz)
July 25, 2022 Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Motion for extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Ryan T. Benson dated July 25, 2022. Document filed by ooShirts Inc...(Benson, Ryan)
July 25, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Ryan T. Benson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26457682. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by ooShirts Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Benson, Ryan)
July 7, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. ooShirts Inc. served on 7/2/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. Service was accepted by Phyllis Grossen, Employee Authorized to Accept Service. Document filed by Christopher Loadholt..(Zelman, Yitzchak)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/22/2022) (vfr)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by August 5, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. ( As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/22/2022) (vfr)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by August 5, 2022, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, on the docket. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by August 5, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/22/2022) (vfr)
June 15, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #5 Order to Show Cause,,. Document filed by Christopher Loadholt..(Zelman, Yitzchak)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, by June 15, 2022, why this action should not be transferred. If Plaintiff fails to respond within the time allowed, or fails to show that venue is proper in the Southern District of New York and that the action should not be transferred in the interest of justice, the Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/8/2022) (vfr)
June 7, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to ooShirts Inc...(pc)
June 7, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
June 7, 2022 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
June 7, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
June 7, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Yitzchak Zelman. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Bronx;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc)
June 6, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ooShirts Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Christopher Loadholt..(Zelman, Yitzchak)
June 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Zelman, Yitzchak)
June 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ooShirts Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26240776)Document filed by Christopher Loadholt..(Zelman, Yitzchak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loadholt v. ooShirts Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Loadholt
Represented By: Yitzchak Zelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ooShirts Inc.
Represented By: Ryan T Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?