Ray v. The New 42nd Street, Inc.
|Defendant:||The New 42nd Street, Inc. and New|
|Filed:||June 8, 2022|
|Court:||US District Court for the Southern District of New York|
|Presiding Judge:||Alvin K Hellerstein|
|Nature of Suit:||Civil Rights: Other|
|Jury Demanded By:||Plaintiff|
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
|Date Filed||Document Text|
|July 7, 2022||Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. The New 42nd Street, Inc. served on 7/7/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Kevin Ray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint).(Allen, Michael)|
|July 7, 2022||Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. The New 42nd Street, Inc. waiver sent on 6/10/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. Document filed by Kevin Ray..(Allen, Michael)|
|June 10, 2022||Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The New 42nd Street, Inc...(pc)|
|June 9, 2022||Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The New 42nd Street, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kevin Ray..(Allen, Michael)|
|June 9, 2022||***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Michael Thad Allen to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the form used for the summons is not the official A.O. 440 (Rev.6/12) Summons in a Civil Case form; Summons Caption Error. Plaintiff party name error in summons caption. The party name does not correspond pleading. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf)|
|June 9, 2022||Case Designated ECF. (vf)|
|June 9, 2022||Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)|
|June 9, 2022||CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)|
|June 9, 2022||***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael Thad Allen. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: The New 42nd Street, Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text added in error; alias party name added in error. (vf)|
|June 8, 2022||Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Allen, Michael)|
|June 8, 2022||Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The New 42nd Street, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kevin Ray..(Allen, Michael) Modified on 6/9/2022 (vf).|
|June 8, 2022||Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The New 42nd Street, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26258079)Document filed by Kevin Ray..(Allen, Michael)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.