Cisse v. Raufer
| Ferima Cisse |
| Susan Raufer |
| 1:2022cv04972 |
| June 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Susan Raufer..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus served. Susan Raufer served on 6/21/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. Service was made by USPS Certified Mail. Document filed by Ferima Cisse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts, #2 Exhibit USPS Online Proof of Delivery on U.S. Attorney Office SDNY).(Yerman, Gary) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 8/26/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 6/17/2022) (tg) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Susan Raufer..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Susan Raufer, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Ferima Cisse..(Yerman, Gary) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Yerman, Gary) |
| Filing 1 PETITION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Susan Raufer (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26278065).Document filed by Ferima Cisse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits In Support of Mandamus Petition).(Yerman, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cisse v. Raufer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ferima Cisse | |
| Represented By: | Gary J. Yerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Susan Raufer | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Roman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
