Nichol v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Diane Patricia Nichol |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv05003 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Jennifer E Willis |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Scheduling Order served on Commissioner of Social Security on 07/01/2022. Service was made by Email. Document filed by Diane Patricia Nichol..(Anklowitz, J.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Susan Colleen Branagan on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Branagan, Susan) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER:The above-referenced social security action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Willis for Report and Recommendation. This Order supersedes all prior scheduling orders in this matter. All motions and applications, including those related to scheduling, and all motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings, must be made to Judge Willis and in compliance with this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jennifer-e-willis. In order to promote the efficient adjudication of this matter, Judge Willis expects the parties to adhere to the following schedule and comply with the following procedures: As further set forth by this Order. Counsel for the Plaintiff must serve this Order on the Defendant and must file proof of such service with the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 6/21/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/16/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636 (c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/16/2022) (ate)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Commissioner of Social Security served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Diane Patricia Nichol..(Anklowitz, J.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on April 20, 2016) (vf)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney J. Anklowitz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Nature of Suit code 864 (Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 865 (Social Security: RSI Tax Suits). (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Diane Patricia Nichol..(Anklowitz, J.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Anklowitz, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26287580)Document filed by Diane Patricia Nichol..(Anklowitz, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
