Gordon v. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP et al
Robert W. Gordon |
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Rory L. Lubin, Stuart Miller and John and Jane Doe |
1:2022cv05212 |
June 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Robert W. Gordon..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Stuart Miller, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Robert W. Gordon..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rory L. Lubin, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Robert W. Gordon..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Robert W. Gordon..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John and Jane Doe, Rory L. Lubin, Stuart Miller, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26309249)Document filed by Robert W. Gordon..(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.