Lupo v. Racer Technologies, Inc.
Nicolette Lupo |
Racer Technologies, Inc. |
1:2022cv05448 |
June 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Racer Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 7/1/2022, answer due 8/30/2022. Document filed by Nicolette Lupo..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: DUE DATE OF JOINT LETTER and PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: February 21, 2023. DATE AND TIME OF CONFERENCE: February 28, 2023 at 4:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 2/28/2023 at 04:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/1/2022) (mml) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Racer Technologies, Inc.. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Racer Technologies, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Nicolette Lupo..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Filing 2 CONSENT TO SUE. Document filed by Nicolette Lupo..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Racer Technologies, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26337818)Document filed by Nicolette Lupo..(Levin-Epstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lupo v. Racer Technologies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicolette Lupo | |
Represented By: | Joshua Levin-Epstein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Racer Technologies, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.