Ambrister et al v. New York City Department of Education
Plaintiff: Rhonda Ambrister and Darren Ambrister
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Case Number: 1:2022cv05516
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Andrew J. Rauchberg dated July 19, 2022. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. By August 29, 2022, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/25/22) (yv)
July 25, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: New York City Department of Education answer due 8/29/2022. (yv)
July 19, 2022 Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Ashleigh C. Rousseau dated July 19. 2022 re: Defendant's Request for Extension. Document filed by Darren Ambrister(Individually), Darren Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(Individually)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)
July 19, 2022 Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Andrew J. Rauchberg dated July 19, 2022. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Rauchberg, Andrew)
June 30, 2022 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint, served. New York City Department of Education served on 6/30/2022, answer due 7/21/2022. Service was accepted by New York City Law Department. Service was made by email. Document filed by Rhonda Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor); Darren Ambrister(Individually); Rhonda Ambrister(Individually); Darren Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)
June 30, 2022 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education..(lal)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by August 29, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 29, 2022 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education.. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (THE PDF IN DOC #3 HAS THE INCORRECT CASE NUMBER) (gp)
June 29, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Darren Ambrister(Individually), Darren Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(Individually)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)
June 29, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
June 29, 2022 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
June 29, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
June 28, 2022 Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Darren Ambrister(Individually), Darren Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Rhonda Ambrister(Individually)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh) Modified on 6/30/2022 (gp).
June 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)
June 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26343821)Document filed by Rhonda Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor), Darren Ambrister(Individually), Rhonda Ambrister(Individually), Darren Ambrister(as Legal Guardian of R.D., a minor)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ambrister et al v. New York City Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhonda Ambrister
Represented By: Ashleigh C Rousseau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darren Ambrister
Represented By: Ashleigh C Rousseau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Represented By: Andrew James Rauchberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?