Fontanez v. Navitas LLC
Ramon Fontanez |
Navitas LLC |
1:2022cv05573 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FIRST MEDIATION CONFERENCE. Mediation Conference scheduled for 9/15/2022 at 03:00 PM in telephone or video conference.(ah) |
NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator.(ah) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Mohammad B. Pathan dated 8/2/2022..Application granted. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to August 31, 2022. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 10. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/3/2022) Navitas LLC answer due 8/31/2022 (ks) |
Filing 10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Mohammad B. Pathan dated 8/2/2022. Document filed by Navitas LLC..(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mohammad Basim Pathan on behalf of Navitas LLC..(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Navitas LLC served on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. Service was accepted by Chris Scargill, Intake Clerk. Document filed by Ramon Fontanez..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of the Court's July 1, 2022 Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference, Docket No. 6 served on Navitas LLC on July 18, 2022. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Ramon Fontanez..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: DUE DATE OF JOINT LETTER and PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: September 22, 2022. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Courts website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 9/29/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/1/2022) (jca) |
Filing 5 MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which has been scheduled for September 29, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. by separate order to be entered today. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. SO ORDERED. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 7/11/2022. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/1/2022) (jca) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Navitas LLC. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Navitas LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ramon Fontanez..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Navitas LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26353347)Document filed by Ramon Fontanez..(Kroub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fontanez v. Navitas LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ramon Fontanez | |
Represented By: | Edward Y. Kroub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Navitas LLC | |
Represented By: | Mohammad Basim Pathan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.