Mojica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
| Jesus Mojica |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2022cv05608 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received returned mail re: #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Petition), #3 Order of Dismissal. Mail was addressed to Jesus Mojica, 54223-054, MDC Brooklyn, P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn, NY 11232 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return To Sender Attempted - Not Known Unable To Forward, RTS. (vn) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3-4. Mailed to: Jesus Mojica 54223-054 MDC Brooklyn P.O. Box 329002 Brooklyn, NY 11232. Mailed: (Attachments: # 1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (dsh) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this petition is denied without prejudice to the pending action under docket number 1:22-CV-5526 (LTS). Because this petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253 The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/14/22) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court denies the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice as duplicative of the pending action under docket number 1:22-CV-5526 (LTS). Because the present petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/14/22) (rdz)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Jesus Mojica..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jesus Mojica..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mojica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jesus Mojica | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
