Genao v. The City of New York
| Antonio Genao |
| The City of New York |
| 1:2022cv05676 |
| July 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3-4. Mailed to: Antonio Genao 421 8th Avenue New York, NY 10001. Mailed: (Attachments: # 1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (dsh) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the August 18, 2022, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/18/22) (rdz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/18/2022: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By order dated July 12, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to resubmit the signature page of the complaint, and either pay the $402.00 in filing fees that are required to file a civil action in this Court or submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On August 5, 2022, the order was returned as undeliverable to the address Plaintiff had provided with his complaint. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order and has failed to notify the Court of a change of mailing address. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to issue judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/18/22) (rdz)
|
| Received returned mail re: #2 Order Directing Original Signature, Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application. Mail was addressed to Antonio Genao, 421 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return To Sender Attempted - Not Known Unable To Forward Return To Sender. (vn) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2. Mailed to: Antonio Genao 421 8th Avenue New York, NY 10001. (dsh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to resubmit the signature page of the complaint with an original signature and pay the filing fees or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Unit within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).( Signature Page due by 8/11/2022, Filing Fee due by 8/11/2022, In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 8/11/2022.) (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/12/2022) (Attachments: #1 Signature page, #2 IFP application) (ees)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The City of New York. Document filed by Antonio Genao. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Genao v. The City of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Genao | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The City of New York | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
