Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp & Franklin Mortgage Asset Trust 2009-A
| Gregory Miles Bartlett |
| Tribeca Lending Corp & Franklin Mortgage Asset Trust 2009-A |
| 1:2022cv05761 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the January 29, 2016 order in Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp., ECF 1:15-CV-6102, 11 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2016), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/14/2022) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: The Court denies Plaintiff's request to file this action (ECF 4), as well as his IFP application, and dismisses the action without prejudice under the court's January 29, 2016, order in Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp., ECF 1:15-CV-6102, 11 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2016). Plaintiff is warned that continued submission of duplicative, vexatious, frivolous, or otherwise nonmeritorious litigation in this court may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/14/2022) (sac)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION pursuant to Court Order Seeking Permission to File New Complaint. Document filed by Gregory Miles Bartlett..(rdz) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Gregory Miles Bartlett consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Gregory Miles Bartlett..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Tribeca Lending Corp & Franklin Mortgage Asset Trust 2009-A. Document filed by Gregory Miles Bartlett..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Gregory Miles Bartlett..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bartlett v. Tribeca Lending Corp & Franklin Mortgage Asset Trust 2009-A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Miles Bartlett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tribeca Lending Corp & Franklin Mortgage Asset Trust 2009-A | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
