Brown v. Cubesmart, L.P.
| Lamar Brown |
| Cubesmart, L.P. |
| 1:2022cv05897 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Cubesmart, L.P. waiver sent on 7/19/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Friel Fleming on behalf of Cubesmart, L.P...(Fleming, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas T. Schwarz on behalf of Cubesmart, L.P...(Schwarz, Douglas) |
Filing 6
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which has been scheduled for October 12, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. by separate order to be entered today. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. Mediators will be assigned based on the nature of suit. Additional expertise requests should promptly be directed to the Mediation Office. SO ORDERED. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. Mediator to be Assigned by 7/22/2022. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/12/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties participate in an initial pretrial conference with the Court at the time listed below. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference. DUE DATE OF JOINT LETTER and PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: October 5, 2022. DATE AND TIME OF CONFERENCE: October 12, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which are available on the Court's website, for the dial-in number and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED.Telephonic Initial Conference set for 10/12/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/12/2022) (ama)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cubesmart, L.P...(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Mars Khaimov. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Bronx;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Queens;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Cubesmart, L.P., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cubesmart, L.P.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26395561)Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Cubesmart, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamar Brown | |
| Represented By: | Mars Khaimov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cubesmart, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Douglas T. Schwarz |
| Represented By: | Michael Friel Fleming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
