Wojcik v. VillageCare Max
| May Wojcik |
| VillageCare Max |
| 1:2022cv06030 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| James L Cott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: By separate Order being entered today, this case is being referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, within two weeks of the date on which Defendant enters an appearance, file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this order (and also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assignedMagistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks on which Defendant enters an appearance, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/26/2022) (rro)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation. All such motions. Referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/26/2022) (rro) Modified on 7/26/2022 (rro).
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to VillageCare Max. (aan) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to VillageCareMax, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by May Wojcik. (sc) |
| Mailed a copy of #5 Summons Issued to May Wojcik 1 Lakeside Ln Westhampton, NY 11977. (aan) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #4 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 7/21/2022, Receipt Number 3260. (ps) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from May Wojcik, re: Please see attached/enclosed check for the payment of Complaint, case #1:22-cv-6030-UA. Please apply this payment for filing fee for pro se complaint. Also please note that the filer is "May" and not "Mary." Document filed by May Wojcik.(sc) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: May Wojcik consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by May Wojcik. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VillageCare Max. Document filed by May Wojcik. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wojcik v. VillageCare Max | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: May Wojcik | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: VillageCare Max | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
