Reches v. Nike USA, Inc. et al
| Shaltiel Reches |
| Nike USA, Inc. and 529 Broadway Holdings, LLC |
| 1:2022cv06082 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1Z E22 E53 37 1007 397 5 on 8/2/2022. (vfr) |
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 8/01/2022) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Patricia O'Connor dated July 29, 2022 re: Response to OTSC. Document filed by Nike USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Tender to Nike).(O'Connor, Patricia) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniella Levi on behalf of Shaltiel Reches..(Levi, Daniella) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Lee Sonkin on behalf of Shaltiel Reches..(Sonkin, Steven) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by no later than Friday, June 29, 2022, Defendant Nike USA, Inc. must show cause why this action should not be remanded to New York Supreme Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to show that the requirements for removal have been satisfied. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/22/2022) (rro)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Judge Lewis J. Liman is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme, County of New York. Case Number: 151575/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26426107).Document filed by Nike USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Pleadings, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Demand, #4 Exhibit Ex. C - Response).(O'Connor, Patricia) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. Document filed by Nike USA, Inc..(O'Connor, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Nike, Inc., Other Affiliate Nike Retail Services, Inc., Other Affiliate Nike USA, Inc. for Nike USA, Inc.. Document filed by Nike USA, Inc...(O'Connor, Patricia) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(O'Connor, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
