Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co. v. Milano Prime, Inc. et al
| Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co. and Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. doing business as Laurice & Co. |
| Milano Prime, Inc., XYZ Companies 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv06085 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. John and Jane Does 1-10 served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022; Milano Prime, Inc. served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. Document filed by Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd...(Salzmann, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (vf) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Milano Prime, Inc.. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Louis Sherman Ederer. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party type was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Thomas Salzmann on behalf of Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co...(Salzmann, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Ederer, Louis) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Milano Prime, Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co...(Ederer, Louis) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Ederer, Louis) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co...(Ederer, Louis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John and Jane Does 1-10, Milano Prime, Inc., XYZ Companies 1-10. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26427122)Document filed by Laurice El Badry Rahme Ltd. d/b/a Laurice & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Ederer, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
