Rosenberg v. United States et al
Petitioner: Rudi Rosenberg
Respondent: United States, E.E.O.C., Charlotte A. Burrows, Janet Dhillon, Kevin Berry, Suzanne Kotrosa, Arlean Clemens Nieto, Richard J. Buckley and Jane & John Does
Case Number: 1:2022cv06174
Filed: July 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiffs submission (ECF 5), construed as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. All other pending matters in this case are terminated. This action is closed. The Clerk of Court is directed not to accept any further submissions under this closed case number except for papers directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/30/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
August 30, 2022 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Rudi Rosenberg were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp)
August 30, 2022 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #7 Notice of Appeal. (tp)
August 30, 2022 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: Rudi Rosenberg 244 Fifth Ave. #2992 New York, NY 10001. (dsh)
August 26, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint). Document filed by Rudi Rosenberg. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (tp)
August 26, 2022 Appeal Fee Due: for #7 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 9/9/2022. (tp)
August 26, 2022 Appeal Remark as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Rudi Rosenberg. IFP Denied 07/27/2022. (tp)
August 25, 2022 Filing 5 PROPOSED EMERGENT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (WITHOUT EMERGENCY RELIEF) FOR CLARIFICATION, CORRECTION & VACTUR OF PRIOR & NEW SANCTIONS ET SEQ. PURS. TO FRCP RULE 59(e)& 60(b), FRAP 10 ET SEQ. NOTICE OF APPEAL. Document filed by Rudi Rosenberg. (sc) Proposed Order to Show Cause to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
July 28, 2022 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3-4. Mailed to: Rudi Rosenberg 244 Fifth Ave. #2992 New York, NY 10001. (kh)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the July 27, 2022, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/27/2022) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On September 20, 2021, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil actions in this court without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Roe v. Data Advantage Group, Inc., ECF 21-CV-1397, 7 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2021). Plaintiff files this new pro se civil action and seeks in forma pauperis (IFP) status, but he has not sought leave from the court to file. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with the September 20, 2021, order. All pending matters in this case are terminated. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/27/2022) (sac)
July 27, 2022 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
July 20, 2022 Filing 2 PETITION WRIT OF MANDAMUS with stay/TRO/INJUNCTIVE Relief against Kevin Berry, Richard J. Buckley, Charlotte A. Burrows, Janet Dhillon, E.E.O.C., Jane & John Does, Suzanne Kotrosa, Arlean Clemens Nieto, United States.Document filed by Rudi Rosenberg..(rdz)
July 20, 2022 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Rudi Rosenberg..(rdz)
July 20, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosenberg v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rudi Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: E.E.O.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charlotte A. Burrows
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Dhillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Berry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Suzanne Kotrosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arlean Clemens Nieto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard J. Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane & John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?